Angola: the American challenge and the Chinese reaction

Angola’s new foreign policy under João Lourenço (2017)

After the end of the Civil War (2002), José Eduardo dos Santos (JES) opted for a “low profile” foreign policy for Angola. Apart from the intensification of relations with China, which essentially had economic objectives, and muscular interventions in African border countries, generally when Angola’s internal security could be at stake, the former President of the Republic did not develop an active policy in the world, preferring it to forget about Angola’s existence.

JES’s non-foreign policy had two fundamental consequences. It took Angola out of the concerns of the major powers, preventing the country from being looked at greedily on the world stage, and in doing so, it allowed the “capture of the state” by private interests to take on unthinkable contours[1] . Angola has become a kind of private property for a few, in the face of the generalised indifference of the world and the glee of sophisticated profiteers.

João Lourenço effectively changed the compass of Angolan foreign policy, promoting what we will call a sovereigntist policy of variable geometry from 2017 onwards.  In other words, Lourenço wanted to put Angola on the world’s radar and the country assumed itself as a regional power, with a role to play in the peaceful stabilisation of Central and Southern Africa; also open to investment and committed to global affairs[2] .

This Laurentian perspective has meant a strong rapprochement with the United States, the Arab countries of the Gulf, but also maintaining relations with China and Russia, and economic realities now impose a stronger bond with India.

While Angola’s new active presidential diplomacy is clear and perceptible, the big question mark is the reaction of the other countries, particularly the major powers, such as the United States, which has an ambiguous history in relation to Angola, as well as China, which is used to playing a decisive role in Angola.

The United States and the Lobito Corridor

It seems that, initially, the United States didn’t understand João Lourenço’s moves. It was at the end of the Trump administration, which had no interest in Africa, there was still, albeit in degradation, an idea of cooperation between America and China, and Russia had not invaded Ukraine. Africa and Angola, in particular, were of no interest to the Americans, except for the traditional oil companies.

However, everything changed at the beginning of the 1920s. The world’s geostrategic situation once again placed Africa as a field of conflicting interests, both in terms of obtaining raw materials (an area in which China was far ahead and in which the US became interested in order to guarantee its strategic autonomy) and in counting support for the Ukrainian War and its aftermath. In this sense, with a new US ambassador in Angola, Tulinabo S. Mushingi, and Luanda’s persistent rapprochement with Washington, the Americans realised that they had a possible new and powerful ally in Angola.

As a result, Angola appeared to become one of the United States’ strongest allies in Africa. Symbols of this were João Lourenço’s trip to Washington for a meeting at the White House with President Joe Biden (December 2023)[3] , and the constant visits by US officials to Luanda (Antony Blinken, five US senators, Samantha Power, Lloyd Austin, among others).

Many projects were announced, most notably the famous Lobito Corridor, which has become the flagship of this intense Angola-US co-operation.

Without going into an in-depth description of this project, the main thing to remember is that it is a railway linking the African interior, including the Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia and Angola itself, to the port of Lobito. Just recently, the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) was announced, mobilising 4.9 billion dollars to date, presented as a significant step by the United States of America, the European Union and private partners to strengthen the commitment to sustainable development and regional integration, benefiting Angola, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo[4] . And at the recent G7 summit in Puglia, Italy, the leaders of the West’s most advanced economies reaffirmed their support for multi-billion dollar infrastructure projects across Africa in order to realise the continent’s economic potential and transformation, specifying the Lobito Corridor as a top priority[5] .

Many observers have claimed that this is a response to Chinese mining domination of Africa[6] . This is unlikely to be the case, since a large part of the minerals to be transported through the Corridor are in mines under Chinese control. Although, according to the Wilson Center, China currently controls only around 8 per cent of Africa’s mining sector, less than half of its Western competitors, this is still an increase from 6.7 per cent in 2018. And as far as the potential beneficiaries of the Lobito Corridor are concerned, what worries the US is China’s monopoly on mining in Africa’s copper belt (Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia) and its recent substantial investments in lithium production in Zimbabwe, which holds Africa’s largest lithium reserves. These investments allow China to dictate the global supply chain for renewable batteries and electric vehicles (EVs). In the DRC, the country with the world’s largest reserves of high-quality cobalt and copper, China currently owns 72 per cent of the cobalt and copper mines, including the Tenge Fungurume mine, which alone produces around 12 per cent of the world’s cobalt output. China’s mining operations in these three countries give Beijing a significant lead in the production of semiconductors and batteries, and therefore in the field of climate security technologies. This leaves the rest of the world increasingly dependent on Chinese innovation and industry to drive global energy transitions and tackle climate change. Furthermore, in the DRC, China owns at least 7 cobalt processing entities, but mainly sends raw minerals back to China for processing and manufacturing in order to meet global demand for critical minerals and finished products[7] .

Naturally, this data on China’s mining influence in the DRC and Zambia makes it clear that the Lobito Corridor will never be an American alternative to Chinese domination of Central African minerals. In fact, to be commercially successful, American transport will need the support of Chinese miners.

Well-placed sources tell us that the objective is less the transport of minerals and more the creation of an agro-industrial development area parallel to the corridor, whose products will be transported through it. It is in this objective that the American option for the Cart Group comes into play. At the aforementioned recent G7 summit, significant funding was announced for the Carrinho Group, which is considered to be a leading Angolan company in the agro-industrial sector, to develop the Lobito Corridor. Apparently, the Carrinho Group, a sort of “darling” company of the Americans, has the task of transforming Angola into a regional food hub, with investments aimed at building and acquiring infrastructure for storing food products[8] . The Carrinho Group has thus become a key part of the American strategy for Africa.

Even so, however, it should be noted that even in the current structure of the Corridor, there is a relevant Chinese company, Mota-Engil, which, although it has a Portuguese name, has the Chinese state as its reference shareholder. The truth is that China Communications Construction Co., Ltd. holds 32.41 per cent of the share capital, and the CEO of Mota-Engil himself, Carlos Mota Santos, has already admitted that CCCC is owned by the State of the People’s Republic of China[9] .

So, at the end of the day, the Lobito Corridor will never be a US project to counter China, but it will certainly have to be a Sino-American co-operative project if it is to succeed. Whether or not this is possible, we’ll see in the future.

The Chinese attitude

For years, while ensuring its exponential economic growth, China adopted a soft and discreet international diplomacy, not confronting but modelling, following the precepts of Deng Xiao Ping, who favoured an international approach known as “taoguang yanghui”, which emphasized the need to avoid polemics and the use of cooperative rhetoric. It is clear that with Xi Jiping, China has entered a new, more assertive phase on the international stage, known as the “warrior wolf”, which does not avoid confrontation, allowing China to occupy the place it recognizes as its own on the world stage.

In this context of assertiveness, contrary to what might have been expected in the past, China has reacted to the American rapprochement with Angola swiftly, above all by expeditiously reoccupying spaces that the Americans or their Western allies have not been able to occupy or where they have been sloppy.

From a political point of view, the Chinese reaction was visible during João Lourenço’s most recent trip to Beijing (March 2024). Although the official statements were of great friendship and success, the Chinese authorities made their disenchantment with João Lourenço known in certain reasonably public circles, contradicting the official narrative of the trip. It was a discreet game, unnoticeable to many, but it existed, demonstrating the Chinese will not “throw in the towel” in Angola.

And the reality is that China’s political will has subsequently asserted itself in China’s field of choice: the economy.

Three recent announcements affirm the renewed Chinese vigour in Angola.

Firstly, a Chinese group is going to build Angola’s first motorway, some 1,400 kilometers long, linking the south to the north of the country. The Chinese state-owned company China Road and Bridge Corporation (CRBC) will build a 1,400 kilometer motorway linking the southern part of Angola with neighbouring Namibia to the northern part of Angola with the Democratic Republic of Congo. Construction is expected to begin at the end of 2025 or in 2026[10] .

This project shows China returning to large-scale infrastructure projects in Angola, something that was thought to be over. However, this is not the case.

Secondly, there is the Angolan government’s intention to terminate the contract with the company that won the tender to build the Soyo refinery, which has had difficulties obtaining funding. This is a consortium led by Quanten, which won an international public tender in 2021 for the construction of the Soyo refinery, made up of four companies, three of which are American (the consortium leader Quanten LLC, TGT INC and Aurum & Sharp LLC) and one Angolan (ATIS Nebest)[11] .

In this case, we have an American failure to secure financing, which leads to the cancellation of a contract, opening the door to China’s entry, because, remember, China had already been involved in the construction of the Soyo refinery during the time of José Eduardo dos Santos, and a Chinese company had come second in the international tender that awarded the contract to Quanten[12] . Now the door is open for the second-placed Chinese, the CMEC consortium made up of China Machinery Engineering Corp,[13] or other Chinese-led interested parties to move into Soyo.

It’s clear that here we are confronted with a typical American problem of our time, the excessive belief in the power of marketing and in financial engineering that is impractical in Africa. To quote the CEO of Mota-Engil, Carlos Mota Santos, the American problem is that “all North American or European investment, with one or two exceptions, is more opportunistic. They are property funds and vulture funds, I don’t see them investing in any industry.”[14]

Finally, we have a third sign of Western withdrawal, now from Siemens, and the opening of more doors to China in an area in which it also has expertise, that of surface metros (let’s remember that the recent fleet of the Porto metro in Portugal has already been equipped with Chinese trains).

Now it’s the case of the surface metro in Luanda. The Germans from Siemens Mobility have pulled out of the project based on a public-private partnership and the Angolan government intends to take on the construction costs itself with funding from China[15] .

It’s a big turnaround, and once again demonstrates the inability or unwillingness of Western companies to invest in Angola. First Quanten failed in Soyo, now Siemens in the Luanda metro. Angola is once again fully open and in need of China to ensure its development.

Slow United States and energetic China

What appears to be the case at the moment is that American and Western goodwill is not enough. The reality is simple. Angola needs money, as it did in 2002 for reconstruction, and once again China seems committed to taking the lead.

The United States seems to want to be with Angola, but when it comes to decisive moments it has no practical or operational solutions, getting lost in plans, projects, trips, financial engineering and announcements of intent. On the other hand, China seems to have realized that a new opportunity is opening up in Angola, and is apparently in a position to take advantage of this new opportunity.

The future will tell.

[1] Rui Verde, 2021, Angola at the Crossroads: Between Kleptocracy and Development, London

[2] See our previous report at


[4] João de Almeida,












Dubai: the new sanctuary for Politically Exposed Persons?

Warning note

This report addresses the apparent breach of international legal obligations by the United Arab Emirates, specifically Dubai. The references made to individuals, such as Isabel dos Santos and other entities cited in the report, respect the principle of the presumption of innocence and do not contain any value judgment about them, only in relation to Dubai’s legal duties.

The federal constitutional system of Dubai

Dubai is not a sovereign state, but a federated state in the United Arab Emirates. The United Arab Emirates is a constitutional federation created in December 1971. It is made up of seven emirates, of which Dubai is one. The political system is based on a constitution that determines the main rules of the country’s political and constitutional organization. According to the custom adopted, the ruler of Abu Dhabi (Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan) is the president of the United Arab Emirates (despite holding the title of president, the country is not governed as a republic, but as a monarchy) and the ruler of Dubai is the prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, the head of government. Within the United Arab Emirates, each emirate has considerable administrative autonomy within itself.

Despite the wide latitude each emirate has, each is subject to federal authority in the following matters: foreign relations, security and defense, nationality and immigration issues, education, public health, currency, postal, telephone and other communication services, air traffic control, aircraft licensing, labor relations, banking, delimitation of territorial waters and extradition of criminals. [1][2]

The federal judiciary is a constitutionally fully independent body (under Article 94 of the Constitution) and includes the Federal Supreme Court and the Courts of First Instance. The Supreme Council of Rulers appoints the five judges headed by a president to the Supreme Court. The judges are responsible for deciding whether federal laws are constitutional, mediating disputes between Emiratis.

Consequently, Dubai is part of a federal legal system in which international relations, and therefore its international obligations, as well as extradition procedures, are subject to the federal rules of the Emirates. In theory, there is a set of rules governing the actions of each Emirate within a constitutional framework.

Isabel dos Santos’ situation and the Interpol warrant

It is public knowledge that the Angolan Attorney General’s Office issued an arrest warrant for the extradition of Isabel dos Santos at the end of 2022, announcing that it had disclosed this through an Interpol Red Notice.

A Red Notice is a request to law enforcement authorities around the world to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition, surrender or similar legal action. It is not an international arrest warrant. Individuals are sought by a requesting member country and the other member countries apply their own laws when deciding whether to arrest a person and extradite them or not.[3]

In the specific case of Isabel dos Santos, it is public and notorious that she is in Dubai. According to Bellingcat, a Dutch-based investigative journalism website specializing in fact-checking and open-source intelligence, founded by British journalist Eliot Higgins in July 2014, a TikTok post by Isabel dos Santos dated December 4, 2022, is located in the swimming pool of the Bulgari Yacht Club in Dubai. In another case, Isabel dos Santos was tagged by a friend in an Instagram post on December 27, 2022, where she can be seen enjoying a meal at Nusr-Et Steakhouse Dubai. She also appeared briefly in another friend’s post from the restaurant that day and the restaurant’s reviews point to the presence of Nusret Gökçe – also known as Salt Bae – at its outlet in Dubai in the last week of December 2022. In a photo posted on Instagram by another friend on January 8, 2023, Isabel dos Santos can be seen in the red and purple corridor of the Trove restaurant in Dubai, within the Dubai Mall complex[4] .

Given that Isabel dos Santos is (or was in 2022 and 2023) in Dubai, and that Angola has issued an arrest warrant published through an Interpol Red Notice, it is important to understand the situation and reaction of Dubai or the United Arab Emirates. Apparently, none.

The legal obligations of Dubai (United Arab Emirates)

The UAE has been a member of Interpol since October 2, 1973. Each of the member countries hosts an INTERPOL National Central Bureau (NCB), which liaises between the various countries and the General Secretariat via a secure global police communications network called I-24/7. The NCBs are the heart of INTERPOL. They seek the necessary information from other NCBs to help investigate crimes or criminals in their own country and share criminal data and information to help another country.[5]

As a result, when Interpol’s local NCB in Abu-Dhabi received a Red Notice concerning someone in Dubai, the Emirati police forces had to take action.

Although there is no extradition agreement between the UAE and Angola, there is a federal law that regulates the issue.  In the UAE, the extradition of wanted persons is governed by Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters (“Extradition Law”). The Extradition Law is generally applied if the UAE and the requesting country do not have an extradition treaty in force.

According to Article 11 of the Extradition Law, a request for surrender must be submitted by the requesting country through diplomatic channels to the competent department and supported by the necessary information and documents, such as the name and description of the wanted person, legal texts applicable to the crime, and the applicable penalty, conviction sentence, if the wanted person has already been convicted, with proof that the sentence is enforceable. All documents and information must be legalized and translated into Arabic.

However, it should be noted that the UAE will not allow the extradition of a person if, under Article 9 of the Extradition Law:

-is a citizen of the United Arab Emirates;

-the object of the crime is political in nature. Terrorist crimes, war crimes and genocide are not considered political crimes;

[It should be noted in this regard that Isabel dos Santos’ public defense of the accusations made against her by the Angolan state is based on this premise: the allegation of political persecution. To that extent, it is an anticipation of a defense that she could make in an Emirati court].

-the object of the crime is limited to infractions of military obligations;

-the request for surrender aims to penalize or prosecute a person for their religion, nationality or ethnic affiliation;

-the wanted person has previously been tried and convicted or acquitted of the same crime;

-the UAE courts have already handed down an irrevocable judgment on the crime for which his extradition has been requested;

-there has been a lapse of time or the criminal proceedings have been closed; or you may be subjected to inhuman or insulting treatment or torture in the requesting country if you are extradited.

In addition to the above, the surrender request is subject to the following key conditions: the crime must be penalized by the laws of the United Arab Emirates and the requesting country for at least 1 year or more in prison.

The competent court has the right to determine whether the requested person should be returned to the requesting country. This determination must be in accordance with the law and the reasons for reaching a decision must be justified (Article 20).

The Extradition Law also allows the UAE authorities to provisionally arrest the wanted person in cases of urgency. Additional documents and information may also be requested by the UAE authorities if it is considered that the information submitted is insufficient.

Reasons for Dubai’s inaction

The matter falls under federal jurisdiction, i.e. the United Arab Emirates and not Dubai.

The Red Notice should have led to action by the local police. That action would not have meant arresting Isabel dos Santos and putting her on a plane to Angola, but the start of the internal judicial process of extradition under Emirati Federal Law.

If this doesn’t happen, there are two opposite explanations.

Hypothesis A: The Dubai pattern: political sanctuary in return for huge investments

Firstly, it could be a deliberate act by the Emirati authorities out of political interest or local corruption. Let’s remember that Dubai has become a safe haven for Russian oligarchs previously based in London.

In fact, it may be the internal policy of the UAE government (or federally-covered Dubai) to be the global point of refuge and reception for various politically exposed people, receiving large sums of money for this protection role.

In fact, since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russian citizens have bought 6.3 billion dollars worth of existing and developing property in Dubai. It is estimated that the amount of Russian money flowing into Dubai real estate has increased more than tenfold since the invasion of Ukraine. This illustrates how the city has become a prime destination for the Russian elite avoiding sanctions or escaping the war itself. Of the 6.3 billion dollars in residential properties acquired – a “conservative estimate”, according to the report – 2.4 billion dollars were existing properties and 3.9 billion dollars were still under development[6] .

There is a pattern of behavior here, applicable to Isabel dos Santos, the Russian oligarchs and anyone else who seeks friendly cover in Dubai. They invest in the country and are welcomed and protected.

This may be the most obvious explanation for Dubai’s dissonant behavior in relation to its international law enforcement obligations.

Hypothesis B: The lack of a comprehensive legal initiative

Although many facts indicate that Dubai purposely assumes itself as a sanctuary for political protection in exchange for large investments, it may be that it considers that domestic federal law is not being fully complied with, leading to action by the authorities.

Strictly speaking, it could be argued that a Red Notice (or any initiative to extradite or freeze the assets of entities located in Dubai) must comply with the protocols set out in Article 11 of the Extradition Law. In other words, in order to be effective in triggering federal judicial proceedings, a Red Alert must be followed by a formal extradition request, which must be submitted by the requesting country through diplomatic channels (Angolan Embassy in Abu Dhabi) to the relevant Emirati department, supported by the necessary information and documents, such as the name and description of the wanted person, legal texts applicable to the crime, and the applicable penalty.  All documents and information must be legalized and translated into Arabic.

In this sense, any Angolan warrant would only be effective when accompanied by the full procedure laid down in Emirati federal law.


The question remains as to whether Dubai is becoming a privileged sanctuary for the refuge and protection of politically exposed people in exchange for large investments, failing to comply with its international legal obligations, or whether there is a lack of knowledge of the internal rules of the Emirates and Dubai that means that the judicial authorities of the various countries are unable to have the necessary success in extending their law enforcement to Dubai.

[1] UAE Constitution, available at

[2] UAE The political system, available at

[3] Interpol.Red Notice. Available

[4] Miguel Ramalho, Wanted by Interpol, Relaxing in Dubai: Geolocating Isabel dos Santos’ Life of Luxury, available at

[5] Interpol. United Arab Emirates, available at

[6] Carmen Molina Acosta and Eiliv Frich Flydal, Russians bought up $6.3 billion in Dubai property after 2022 Ukraine invasion, report finds, Available at

India: a new strategic bet for Angola?

The centrality of trade relations between India and Angola

Angola has become the epicenter of many international relations. There is talk of the rapprochement with the United States, the recalibration with China, the history with Russia, the role in the Great Lakes. However, one of the relationships that is discreetly becoming more important, but seems to have been forgotten, or needs to be discovered, is the relationship with India.

India is currently Angola’s third largest trading partner, sharing around 10% of Angola’s foreign trade, mainly due to the purchase of crude oil in bulk. The trade balance is in Angola’s favor, with India being Angola’s 2nd largest oil importer, accounting for 90% of bilateral trade. The trade relationship is clearly driven by the oil partnership.

Clearly, since 2021-22, India-Angola bilateral trade has been on the rise, reaching 3.2 billion dollars in 2021-22, with a large increase in Indian exports to Angola of 452 million dollars (45 % increase year-on-year). Bilateral trade in 2022-23 reached 3.9 billion dollars (by February 2023), with Indian exports to Angola registering a new high of 575 million dollars[1] .

Figure 1: Angola – India: Imports/Exports

(in millions of dollars)

Source: Embassy of India in Luanda (April 2023)[2]

As a comparison, the value of trade in tradable goods (excluding services) between Portugal and Angola totals €1,149.3 million (M€) in exports and €488.1 M€ in imports, on average for the 2019-2023 period.[3]

It’s easy to see that the value of trade relations between India and Angola is three times greater than that between Angola and Portugal. India is already a giant in its relationship with Angola.

Figures in millions of USD. For Portugal average 2019-2023, for India values 2023.

The Indian community in Angola is made up of around 4,000 people, mainly based in offshore oil fields or working in establishments owned by Indian owners, mostly involved in restaurants, supermarkets, commerce and other services; in industries dealing with plastics, metal, steel, clothing. In the non-oil sector, several projects are being carried out by Indian companies in the retail, hotel, agricultural plastics, scrap metal, steel, trade and other services sectors[4] .

India’s potential in relation to Angola

Having established the strong economic ties between India and Angola, it is worth highlighting India’s potential and the possibilities it opens up for Angola.

India is one of the world’s fastest growing large countries, expanding at an annual rate of 6-7%. New data shows that private sector confidence is at its highest level since 2010. Already the fifth largest economy, it could take third place by 2027, after America and China. India’s influence is manifesting itself in new ways. American companies have 1.5 million employees in India, more than in any other foreign country. Its stock market is the fourth most valuable in the world, while the aviation market ranks third. India’s purchases of Russian oil drive global prices. Increased wealth means more geopolitical clout. India has sent ten warships to the Middle East to contain the Houthis in Yemen.[5]

India’s strong presence in the Gulf should also be noted. Since Modi (the Indian prime minister) took office in 2014, India has transformed its relationship with the Gulf states, moving from one centered on energy, trade and Indian expatriates, to a new framework that encompasses political relations, investment and cooperation in defense and security. In addition, India has a keen interest in the stability of the Gulf, given that approximately 8.8 million Indian citizens live in the region[6] .

These are the essential facts, which pose a strategic challenge for Angolan presidential diplomacy.

As we all know and have mentioned in previous reports, João Lourenço’s new foreign policy, launched after 2017, is based on several vectors: a rapprochement with the United States and Europe in general, a new relationship with the Gulf States, a friendly recalibration with China and a repositioning with Russia. All this has been done. Now it will be India’s time.

India as a strategic priority for Angola

Given India’s economic growth and potential, its relationship with the Gulf States, as well as its global position as a country that is friendly to the United States but maintains its own external sovereignty, which leads it to buy oil from Russia, among other things, it is important to include India in Angola’s strategic priorities.

The point is not only that India is a market with clear potential for Angolan oil, as well as for other future exports, such as those linked to the agri-food sector, but also that it is a source of technological innovation for Angola. However, India’s economic aptitude is also important and relevant in discovering new robust markets for Angola.

Equally important is that India can be a support for Angola in its relations with the Gulf, where many Indians occupy prominent positions in the financial sector, and at the same time serve as a support for the difficult negotiations with China over the debt and, finally, serve as an example to the United States of a friendly country, but one that follows its own foreign policy.

These elements, both economic and in terms of international relations, are strong enough to attract the attention of Angolan presidential diplomacy to create a common framework for intense political and commercial cooperation. It is easy to understand that India can be an excellent expansion market for Angola, as well as a technological partner, and can also be complementary to Angola in many political aspects, both in establishing bridges with the Gulf countries and in knowing how to draw the boundaries of balance in relations with the major powers. This experience should be assimilated by Angola.

It should be remembered that the history of relations between heads of government (presidents of the republic and prime ministers) is not very intense. The first visit by an Indian prime minister to Angola took place in May 1986, by Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, which was reciprocated by Angolan President José Eduardo dos Santos in April 1987. PM Dr. Manmohan Singh met President José Santos on the sidelines of the G-8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy, on July 10, 2009. In October 2015, Angola’s Vice-President Manuel Vicente visited India to take part in the Third India-Africa Summit. Finally, during his visit to Johannesburg to attend the BRICS Summit, Angolan President João Lourenço met Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 26, 2018 and discussed ways to improve trade and investment between the two countries and also to deepen cooperation in sectors such as Energy, agriculture, food processing and pharmaceuticals[7] .

There really is no proximity between diplomacies at the highest level. Now, it is this pattern that would indicate that we need to move to a new level. This is possibly the time to create a strong bridge between India and Angola, based on political and economic aspects.

[1] Embassy of India Luanda (2023) Bilateral Brief on India-Angola Relations:

[2] idem

[3] GPP (2024) ANGOLA Trade with Portugal (PT) 2019-2023:

[4] Ditto note 1

[5] The Economist (2024), How strong is India’s economy?

[6] Viraj Solanki (2024) The Gulf region’s growing importance for India:

[7] See note 1.

CEDESA launches portal on Public Works and Investments in Angola

On Thursday 18th April, CEDESA – the Centre for Studies for the Economic and Social Development of Africa – presented its website on Public Works and Investments in Angola –, with the dual aim of providing independent information to academics, journalists and interested parties in general on what is happening in Angola in this area, and to serve as a public information document for Angolan civil society on the evolution of major works in the country, through the creation of a participatory opening mechanism.

The presentation of the project was attended by members of the Angolan and Chinese Embassies in Portugal and the Angolan Consulate General in Lisbon, as well as various businesspeople, academics and journalists.

CEDESA is a non-profit organisation under private law dedicated to the study and research of political and economic issues in southern Africa, particularly Angola. It was born out of an initiative by several academics and experts from the Angola Research Network (ARN , with the main aim of providing rigorous analyses of the economic outlook for Angola and neighbouring countries to political decision-makers, the business community, academics, students and other interested parties.

Source: CEDESA (

In search of a new paradigm for Angola-China relations

Overcoming the debt issue

Apparently, João Lourenço is due to visit China soon, and Beijing already has an ambassador in Luanda again. So, there are marked dynamic movements in the Angola-China relationship.

It’s not the Angolan President’s first visit to Beijing, but it is the first after his public and effective rapprochement with the United States, and at a time when the issue of debt to China has become the main aspect of relations between the two countries.

With regard to debt, there is one indisputable fact. Angola has made a substantial reduction in its capital debt since 2017. In fact, in that year the amount of capital owed was 23.204,9 billion dollars, while at the end of 2023 it only stood at 17.921,0 billion US dollars, a reduction of exactly 5.283,9 billion dollars according to official figures from the National Bank of Angola (BNA), in capital alone, not including interest.[1] This means that even during years of crisis – don’t forget that the Angolan economy contracted between 2016 and 2020[2] – the Angolan state was able and willing to pay its debt to China.

So the question is not one of capacity, but one of sacrifice, or rather opportunity cost. The capital taken from the state budget to pay China is capital that is not used in other sectors, such as human development, education, health, sanitation, etc. In addition, of course, the budgetary instability caused by fluctuating oil prices always puts great pressure on the treasury’s liquidity to meet payments.

It is for this reason, and after the great Angolan effort of more than 5 billion dollars made during João Lourenço’s presidency, that this should be the time to decompress in the payment of the debt to China.

In addition to this, there is another fact, which has already been dealt with sufficiently[3] , which is the so-called “odious debt”. It now appears that a large part of the debt Angola contracted from China ended up illegally in the hands of private Angolan entities that did not use the funds for the common good, but for their own undue profit. Recent reports indicate that the entire mechanism for embezzling funds was structured with the participation of Chinese entities mandated by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party[4] . If confirmed, and it has not been duly certified, this action places the amounts of “odious debt” in a separate category, which should be the subject of separate negotiation by the diplomacies of the two countries, so as not to give rise to any proceedings in an arbitration court, as is provided for in the bilateral financing agreements.

Once the issue of debt has been framed, it is clear that now is the time to move beyond debt and create a new paradigm for relations between Angola and China

The new paradigm between Angola and China: emptying the China-US Manichaeism

It could be thought that João Lourenço’s rapprochement with Joe Biden, promoting an effective strengthening of Angola’s relations with the United States, would lead to a necessary estrangement and distancing from China.

We don’t share that view. On the contrary, it is understood that the Manichean vision that supports this view is not supported by facts.

Firstly, in the economic sphere, despite the American rhetoric that began with the Trump administration and continued with Biden, what is certain is that relations between the two countries – the US and China – remain intense. American companies – and Western companies in general – are still very dependent on Chinese markets and production chains. The more aggressive rhetoric has only benefited a few intermediary countries that receive Chinese investment and then export the products resulting from that investment to the US with a “non-Chinese label”, and in the end the ties remain strong. In this sense, for example, Tesla’s Elon Musk is inviting Chinese suppliers of parts for his cars to replicate their production chains from China to Mexico[5] . Recently, the CEO of Apple – Tim Cook – met with Chinese officials and reaffirmed his commitment to the Chinese market and his desire to forge closer ties with the Beijing government[6] . Another current example is ExxonMobil, the American energy giant that plans to invest in a multi-billion dollar petrochemical complex in Guangdong province[7] . In fact, if everything goes according to plan, the project, which has a total investment of 10 billion dollars, will have its first phase completed before the end of the year. Not to mention Starbucks, the American multinational, which now has more than 6,800 shops in China alone, and which in 2023 invested more than 200 million dollars in a new campus in China, a sign of how crucial the Chinese consumer continues to be for the global coffee chain, despite a certain economic slowdown .[8]

In addition, the success of the Lobito Corridor, on which both Angola and the United States are betting, necessarily requires Chinese competition – which dominates the bulk of the raw materials – in order to be successful.

These real facts about the economic infrastructure point to a necessary triangulation between intermediary countries, China and the United States, which translates into an ideal role for Angola, which is rightly positioned as a “bridge” between Asia and the West. This reciprocal rapprochement can therefore be beneficial rather than disadvantageous, if Angola takes advantage of its role as a hinge in a skillful and intelligent way.

The new paradigm between Angola and China: exchanging loans for productive investment

The essential fact is the need for a paradigm shift. Angola cannot sustain its treasury and development on loans that have to be paid back. This doesn’t mean that it won’t use them and resort to them when it needs to, but the strategy has to be different, and different means investment. What we want from China is investment, not more loans.

Let’s look at China’s policy in Portugal. There, China essentially makes investments, buys shares in companies and becomes a partner in others. It brings capital to Lisbon to invest in the production process, not to earn interest. The main Chinese investments in Portugal are concentrated in sectors such as banking, energy and insurance. Take the case of EDP. Chinese investment in EDP – Energias de Portugal, S.A. is significant. China Three Gorges (CTG) has been EDP’s largest shareholder since 2011. Last year, the shares held by CGT were valued at 4,634 million euros[9] . In the health sector, the Chinese private group Fosun stands out as the largest shareholder in the Luz Saúde Group.  This group, which is one of Portugal’s leading healthcare organizations, is controlled by the Chinese Fosun and the insurance company Fidelidade (which, in turn, also has the Chinese Fosun as a shareholder)[10] . The group currently manages 30 hospitals, clinics and health centres. In 2022, its operating profits totaled 600 million euros, up 11 % on the previous year[11] .

In 2023, Portugal attracted more foreign industrial investment and the largest came from China.[12] This is “the Chinese electric car battery factory CALB, which has already started the environmental licensing process for a new plant in Sines, a project worth 2060 million euros, for which 90 hectares of land have been set aside and 1800 jobs have been promised[13] “.
 This is the kind of relationship that Angola should begin to have with China. Not a relationship of dependence on loans, but of direct Chinese investment in the Angolan economy.

There are several areas for Chinese investment in Angola, but we would highlight the possibilities of car factories, given the huge increase in this industry in China and the fact that it is becoming the largest in the world. Equally important is the telecommunications and electricity sector, which is so lacking in Angola. Another sector to invest in could be textiles, after the failure of Ethiopia, shortening the logistical supply lines to the US and Europe in relation to Vietnam.

Other hypotheses should be studied, but here are some suggestions for Chinese investment in Angola: creating a cluster in the automobile industry, telecommunications and electricity, textiles.

[1] PUBLIC EXTERNAL DEBT BY COUNTRY (STOCK): 2009 – 2023,                  


[3] Rui Verde, 2023, O tratamento jurídico a conferir à dívida pública angolana à China que resulta de apropriação privada, Communication to the III International Congress of Angolanistics
Biblioteca Nacional /Lisboa






[9] Idem.




[13] Idem.

The need for a joint African Union mechanism for Africa’s debt to China

The framework and problems of debt to China in Africa

Africa is a continent that is mentioned many times because of its vast natural wealth. Unfortunately, this is not reflected in the wealth of the African populations, who consequently suffer a variety of deprivations.

In this context, the issue of the debt owed by African countries to China is taking on somewhat worrying contours. The loans taken out by sub-Saharan African countries from China have seen a major boost, especially since the Road and Belt Initiative (RBI) was established in 2013. This ambitious Chinese initiative, whose main driving force was President Xi Jinping, aimed to increase the country’s economic and geopolitical influence. And while loans grew dramatically in 2013 with 17.5 billion dollars, and even peaked in 2016 with 28.4 billion dollars, in the following years the drop in loan amounts was incessant, reaching 1.2 billion in 2021, and the following year totalling just 994 million dollars (a total of 9 loans), making it the lowest level of Chinese loans since 2004.[1]

Fig.1 – Annual evolution of Chinese loans to Africa (billions of dollars)

Source: Chinese Loans to Africa Database, Boston University

The channelling of this Chinese money into development in Africa, specifically in the financing of various infrastructure projects and other ventures, has stimulated some African economic growth. However, there have been several “grey clouds”, many of which are clearly visible in the Angolan economy, but which also stand out in other countries. This translates into an often undisguised unease in Sino-African relations. Some countries have even become hostages to the so-called “debt trap diplomacy”. China, by unleashing the RBI, provoked the idea of facilitating loans to other developing economy states, and indeed, this ended up making the Asian country the largest international creditor. However, these loans have often lacked transparency: cases of corruption have multiplied, often because the financing did not go through public tender processes. The problem of the so-called ‘hidden debt’ arose when “China stopped lending to central governments and state-owned or state-supported companies. These debts do not appear on government balance sheets, although governments are often responsible for them if the official debtor is unable to pay.”[2]

You might think that this situation could eventually benefit the Chinese, since they have several countries “stuck” with monstrous debts. However, this is not the case, because at the same time, China is facing very serious domestic economic problems, which, until they are solved, will make it difficult to promote a reduction in foreign debt at the same time. [3]

Indeed, the slow recovery from the pandemic, the problem of youth unemployment, and the collapse of the property sector have shaken what seemed to be China’s unshakeable growth. This is how Christoph Nedopil, founder and director of the Chinese think tank Green Finance and Development Centre (GFDC), argues: “it will be a domestic challenge for China to simultaneously promote debt reduction abroad as long as domestic economic problems are not fully resolved.”[4]

In December 2022, Chatham House published a report analysing the development of the model of Chinese loans to African states (2000-2020), which were initially based on providing resources, and then evolved into more strategic or business-oriented choices.

Fig 2: Top 10 recipients of Chinese loans in Africa, 2000-20

Source: Chatham House:

It should be noted, however, that from 2021 onwards the Asian country’s orientation changed, for reasons already mentioned, and also because several states were not meeting their payments. The Chinese leadership changed course and stopped investing in large projects, such as railways and motorways, to focus on smaller loans with a more beneficial social and environmental impact. The climate agenda was another factor to enter the equation.[5]

In addition, the money began to change direction; previously most of the loans went to countries in East and Southern Africa. From 2021-22 there was a shift towards West Africa, with countries like Senegal, Benin and Côte d’Ivoire receiving most of the money.[6]

Many African states and others have defaulted on their debts, so it was imperative that ways were found to resolve China’s so-called ‘odious debt’.

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the world’s most indebted poor countries have all borrowed heavily from China. This situation, as we have already mentioned, may constitute “debt trap diplomacy”, in which China deliberately grants loans to countries it knows it cannot repay, in the hope of gaining political influence.[7]

What we saw last year was a growth in Chinese exports to Africa, which reached 173 billion dollars, an increase of 7.5 per cent compared to 2022, while its imports from the continent fell by 6.7 per cent to 109 billion dollars (data provided by the Chinese General Administration of Customs).

Although the annual increase of 100 million dollars made bilateral trade in 2023 a record, Africa’s trade deficit with China continued to rise, from 46.9 billion dollars in 2022 to 64 billion dollars last year.[8]

In 2022, 60 per cent of China’s debtor nations were in financial difficulties, compared to 5 per cent in 2010.[9]

How have some of these African nations dealt with this debt problem, and how has China changed its behaviour over time?

Let’s analyse a few cases:


The Middle Kingdom has been tough in the debt restructuring negotiations, and the situation, despite all the constraints, is not worse because other actors are gaining prominence, not just states, such as economic institutions like the IMF or the World Bank, or organisations that promote international negotiation and dialogue, such as the G20.

In the case of Zambia, which is the continent’s largest copper producer, it was the first sovereign nation in Africa during the pandemic to default when it failed to make a bond payment of 42.5 million dollars. The debt ended up preventing the country from developing economically and taking on new projects. So, in June 2023, Zambia and its creditors, including China, finally reached an agreement within the G20 Common Framework to restructure 6.3 billion dollars in loans.[10] This relief was limited to deadline extensions and a grace period on interest payments, but in order to reach a consensus there were no debt cuts,

However, in November there were already disagreements, as the Zambian government announced that a revised agreement to rework 3 billion dollars in eurobonds could not be implemented due to objections from official creditors, including China.

These problems in restructuring Zambia’s debt, which had been negotiated within the G20 Common Framework, ended up greatly undermining the negotiations and further delaying debt restructuring, putting the lives of ordinary Zambians in ever greater agony.[11]


At the beginning of last year, Ghana owed China 1.7 billion dollars, according to the International Institute of Finance, a financial services trade association focused on emerging markets.[12] Like Zambia, Ghana went into sovereign default on 60 billion dollars in domestic and external debt at the end of 2022 and sought a resolution to this problem soon afterwards under the Common Framework for official external debt of 5.4 billion dollars.[13]

An agreement was reached with the official creditors to restructure the debt, along the same lines as Zambia. However, although this agreement has unlocked an IMF loan, progress has been slow.

Currently, according to some sources, “Ghana intends to carry out a simple debt restructuring, exchanging old bonds for new notes, at a time when the country is seeking to relieve a debt of around 13 billion dollars owed to international private creditors”.[14] However, the information provided has been contradictory, which is why the Ghanaian government has been cautious about a debt overhaul that would include a gradual reduction, in which bondholders would receive less if macroeconomic results were not as good as expected.[15]

Nevertheless, the government has told investors that it would like to reach a solution following the agreement on public debt reached with creditors such as the Paris Club and China.


Ethiopia is the second most populous country in Africa and the tenth largest in terms of area, but it is also one of the African states experiencing the greatest geopolitical, military and economic turbulence. The proximity to the Chinese state goes back a long way. Ethiopia recently signed several bilateral agreements with several of its official creditors, including China itself. With low foreign currency reserves, which have been a constant problem in the country, and high inflation, it has reached bilateral agreements to suspend debt servicing. With China, it obtained a two-year debt suspension, which is quickly being cancelled. Ethiopia has 28.2 billion dollars in foreign debt, half of which is Chinese. According to the African Development Bank, Ethiopia’s GDP is expected to grow by 5.8 per cent in 2023 and 6.2 per cent in 2024, mainly on the basis of industry, consumption and investment. On the other hand, inflation reached 34 per cent in 2022. Due to high defence spending and declining revenue collection, the budget deficit was 4.2% of GDP in 2022.[16] Against this backdrop, Ethiopia needs development support, debt relief and Foreign Direct Investment.[17]

The Angolan situation

Angola’s debt to China is older than the Belt and Road initiative of 2013. It began to develop after the end of the Civil War in 2002, with China becoming the main financier of the reconstruction that followed. At the moment, according to official data from the National Bank of Angola (BNA), Angola’s public debt stock in relation to China is 18.4 billion dollars (billions in Anglo-American terms), corresponding to 37 per cent of the total debt. What’s more, the figures show that between 2019 and 2023 this amount fell from 22.4 billion to 18.4 billion. This means that, in four years, Angola has paid – in capital alone, not counting interest – 4 billion dollars to China[18] . Everyone has noticed the weight that public debt payments have on the state budget, and there were serious problems with Angola’s public finances in 2023, and it is expected that the same will happen in 2024, especially from March onwards, given the need for payments to China.

Although we don’t believe that the payment of the debt to China jeopardises the solvency of the Angolan state, we do believe that it has a very significant crowding out effect, since it removes resources from the General State Budget that could be earmarked for development and the social sector to pay off debt, debt that is controversial to some extent, since the loans were used in a very questionable way: Part of that debt was earmarked for disposable infrastructure, such as stadiums and roads that today are in a precarious condition. In addition, a significant portion of these loans ended up being privately appropriated by Angolan leaders, damaging the country’s economy.

There is a clear Angolan problem with Chinese debt, which, as we have just briefly described, also exists in relation to other African countries.

Fig. 3 – Chinese loans to Africa and Angola (in USD$ billion)

Source: China Africa Research Initiative – Johns Hopkins University ( 

The creation of a common mechanism within the African Union (AU) to negotiate Chinese debt

Since the Chinese debt is an African issue, it should no longer be dealt with bilaterally, as it is clear that each state on its own may be too weak to negotiate with China, one of the world powers of today, or to appear alone in the organisations promoted by the creditors. The creditors unite, while the African countries face them individually without support.

It would be important for the Conference of the African Union, the AU’s supreme body made up of heads of state and government (Article 6 of the AU’s Constitutive Act), to set up a Joint Chinese Debt Negotiation Committee (Article 6(d)), mandated to negotiate with the Chinese authorities a global framework for readjusting Africa’s debt to China, which would then be applied to all those seeking debt relief.

It is clear that negotiating Africa’s debt with China is a complex process that involves interaction between different parties with different interests and objectives. In order to achieve success, it is essential to consider African unity in demanding Chinese co-operation. This unity means, from the outset, gathering information and obtaining as many elements as possible for the negotiation, which a joint body can facilitate. In complex negotiations, time and the ability to understand the other person are fundamental aspects, and in this sense, a unified African solution will allow for a much greater exchange of experiences and, at the same time, a more technical, less emotional and more ‘negotiatingly’ weighty follow-up to the negotiation.

It is essential that Africa draws up a joint policy to deal with Chinese debt on an equal footing and not from a position of weakness.

A clear solution is to pass all the negotiations through a united African body within the African Union, becoming an enlarged African Union-China negotiation. This would also make it possible to strengthen the unity of the cradle continent.


[2] Africa Defence Forum Magazine:


[4] idem


[6] idem

[7]  Visual Capitalist:

[8] South China Morning Post:

[9] Visual Capitalist:

[10] Associated Press:

[11] Afronomics Law:


[13] Economist Intelligence:


[15] idem

[16] Observer Research Foundation:

[17] idem

[18] Rui Verde,

The electoral system of Local Authorities in Angola and the inclusion of Traditional Power

Rui Verde

Previous note:

Having been invited and accepted to participate in the 1st Angolan Congress on Electoral Law, to be held on December 7 and 8, 2023, for technical reasons I was unable to present my paper online. Here is the text of the presentation.

Specificity of local elections

A local electoral system does not necessarily have to replicate the national system. Although in both cases we are dealing with the choice of representatives in democratic processes, the nature of the elections and bodies is somewhat different.

In many countries, the abstention rate in local elections is higher than in national elections[1] , and local governance is dedicated to issues that are often different from national issues. To a certain extent, although this is disputable, especially in politically polarized countries like Angola, it is understood that local politics will be essentially non-ideological. In the United States, for many years, academics argued that there was little difference between the policies of locally elected officials from the Democratic or Republican parties because most local political issues were technical and non-political. As Adrian wrote, “there is no Republican way to pave a street and no Democratic way to install a sewer.”[2] It should also be noted that the issue of representation of various minorities and interests is particularly acute at the local level.[3]

It is this structural differentiation that serves as the starting point for a short commentary on the current electoral system for local authorities in Angola, addressing two specific issues. Firstly, there will be a brief description of the current constitutional-legal model for local elections, and secondly, a brief reflection on the role of traditional power, given the undeniable demographic pressure in Angola.

Local power in the Constitution

The first place to look at local power in the Angolan legal system is the Constitution (CRA), which deals with the subject in Articles 213 et seq.

It states that the “organizational forms of Local Power include Local Authorities, the institutions of Traditional Power” (art. 213, no. 2) and that Local Authorities “have, among others and under the terms of the law, the following powersº 2) and that Local Authorities “have, among others and under the terms of the law, powers in the areas of education, health, energy, water, rural and urban equipment, heritage, culture and science, transport and communications, leisure and sports, housing, social action, civil protection, environment and basic sanitation, consumer protection, promotion of economic and social development, land use planning, municipal police, decentralized cooperation and twinning.” (art. 219), with various bodies such as an “Assembly with deliberative powers, a Collegiate Executive Body and a Mayor” (art. 220, no. 1).

In terms of the electoral system, the Constitution establishes that the “Assembly is made up of local representatives, elected by universal, equal, free, direct, secret and periodic suffrage of the electors in the area of the respective municipality, according to the proportional representation system.” (art. 220, no. 2), the “Collegiate Executive Body is made up of its President and Secretaries appointed by it, all accountable to the Municipal Assembly.” (article 220, no. 3) and the President of the Executive Body of the Municipality is the head of the list with the most votes for the Assembly (article 220, no. 4). Finally, Article 220(5) states that “candidacies for elections to local authority bodies may be presented by political parties, alone or in coalition, or by groups of voting citizens, under the terms of the law.”

Regarding the institutions of traditional power, the Constitution recognizes them in its articles 223 and following, referring to customary law for their designation, and to the law for their articulation with Local Authorities (article 225).

Consequently, according to the Constitution, there are two forms of local power, local authorities and traditional power, the relationship between which is not established in the fundamental law. In the case of local authorities, their method of election is defined from the outset, which is not the case, of course, with traditional power.

The electoral system of local authorities

In order to describe the electoral system envisaged for Local Authorities, in addition to the Constitution, the Organic Law on the Organization and Functioning of Local Authorities (Law no. 27/19 of 25 September) must be added, as well as the Organic Law on Local Elections (Law no. 3/20 of 27 January), which we will stick to in this description.

As mentioned, there are three bodies in municipalities: the assembly, the executive and the mayor. Looking at the municipality, the local authority par excellence (article 218 of the CRA), we see that only two of these bodies, the assembly and the mayor, are elected. The executive is appointed by the mayor. In fact, Article 29(2) of the Law on the Organization and Functioning of Local Authorities states that the Municipal Council (the executive) is made up of Secretaries appointed by the Mayor, although they are accountable to the Municipal Assembly. The removal of Secretaries is the responsibility of the Mayor (Article 31(1)(b)).

In municipalities, there are two elective bodies, and we’ll focus on them. These are the Municipal Assembly and the Mayor.

The members of the elective bodies are elected by universal, equal, direct, secret and periodic suffrage by the citizens residing in the local district (article 15 of the Municipal Elections Law – LEA). The most relevant article of the LEA is Article 40, which defines the single-list electoral model for the Assembly and the Mayor’s Office, replicating the national constitutional model that has raised so much controversy. In fact, under the terms of this regulation there will only be one list. Article 40 of the LEA states that candidacies for Mayor are presented in the context of the presentation of lists of candidates for members of the Local Authority Assembly (Article 40(1)), and that the candidate for Mayor is the one who appears first on the list of candidates for member of the Assembly (Article 41(2)). Accordingly, each ballot paper will bear the name of the competing party, coalition or group of citizens, the name of the candidate for mayor and the respective passport photo, the acronym and symbols of the candidacy (Article 17 of the LEA). The person on the list with the highest number of votes, even if not an absolute majority, will be elected Mayor, and will have the right to appoint the entire executive (article 21 of the LEA). The members of the Municipal Assembly are elected according to the proportional representation system, following the d’Hondt method for converting votes into mandates in accordance with the rules of article 29 of the LEA.

It should be noted that this electoral system, as well as the rules regarding the ballot paper, have already been upheld constitutionally by Ruling 111/2010 of the Constitutional Court when it considered the text that became known as the 2010 Constitution.

So we have a mixture of the one-round majority system that elects the mayor and the proportional system that determines the composition of the municipal assembly.

It will be argued in its defense that it simultaneously guarantees the efficiency of the government (one-round majority system) with broad democracy (proportional system for the constitution of the Assembly).

But it could also be said that it retains the “defect” of a not entirely direct election of the President, which many in the CRA criticize with reference to the election of the President of the Republic.

Also for those who like Portuguese comparatistics, it should be noted that it does not follow the Portuguese model in which the election of the Mayor is separate from the election of the Municipal Assembly, and a party can win the Presidency and lose the Assembly as is currently the case in Lisbon, in addition to the fact that the executive (Council) is formed according to the electoral results, depending on the presidential will only the distribution or not of portfolios[4] .

In this respect, the Portuguese model could be educational, as it would teach the various parties, which are usually polarized, to enter into local government agreements, which would be a basis for a good democratic spirit of dialogue and tolerance.

As an innovative reference, it should be mentioned that groups of voting citizens can, without any authorization, stand in municipal elections (art. 44 of the LEA) provided that they are at least 150 voting citizens in the respective constituency (art. 48, no. 1 of the LEA).

Traditional power and demographic expansion

It is a fact that Angola’s demography has undergone an explosion. “Between 1960 and 2020, Angola’s population grew 6.2 times, reaching more than 30 million inhabitants, a more significant increase than that seen in sub-Saharan African countries (5.1x) and than in other regions such as East Asia (2.3x) and Latin America (2.9x).”[5]

It is clear that this number of inhabitants is not in line with the current number of Angolan municipalities, 164. Just remember that Portugal, with 10 million inhabitants, has 308 municipalities.

While it is true that the current number of municipalities in Angola does not correspond to the real needs of the population, it is also true that the idea of increasing the number from 164 to 581 is absurdly impossible, both for financial reasons and for administrative and bureaucratic reasons.[6]

We therefore need to look for innovative, possible and constitutional responses. It is in this sense that the constitutional system is relevant, placing the institutions of traditional power under the heading of local power, which also includes local authorities. The same is true of the Organic Law on Local Power, Law 15/17 of August 8, which deals with Local Authorities and Institutions of Traditional Power.

The constitutional and legal system outlines a start on answering the question we posed above. To the systematics we have to add some considerations about the current paradigm of law. We can no longer think of law in terms of the positive rational frameworks of the 18th and 19th centuries, which apply a single menu to all the regulation of social life. Without delving into the subject here, we have to consider law as an open system[7] that allows for various material intersections and contributions and not just a closed, single and reductive positivism. It is in this context that it is important to allow the institutions of traditional power to take on the role of local authority where these do not exist and are necessary.

The reality is that there are two types of Local Authorities in force, those regulated by positive law and those derived from customary law and regulated by custom, accepting a plurality of regimes, legal and customary[8] , with a view to the effective implementation of decentralized local power close to the population, accepting the “presence of more than one normative order in a social field.” [9]

In essence, it is a question of realizing a systematic desire of the Constitution, which, by placing both formal Local Authorities and Local Power Institutions under the aegis of Local Power, is not making a mistake, as some claim, but is opening up avenues for the consideration of a true legal pluralism in Angola, which will act as a solution to problems linked to the efficiency of the state machine.

[1] Anzia SF. 2013. Timing and Turnout: How Off-Cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press or Hajnal ZL. 2009. America’s Uneven Democracy: Race, Turnout, and Representation in City Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.

[2] Adrian CR. 1952. Some general characteristics of nonpartisan elections. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 46: 766-786, p. 766.

[3] Abott, Carolyn, and Asya Magazinnik. “At-Large Elections and Minority Representation in Local Government.” American Journal of Political Science 64, no. 3 (2020): 717-33.

[4]  Law no. 75/2013, of September 12th

[5] Economic Studies Group (2023), Demographic transition in Angola: burden or bonus? MakaAngola,

[6] Verde, Rui, (2022), The “(ir)rational” of the 581 municipalities, MakaAngola,

[7] Viehweg, T. Topik und Jurisprudenz, 1954; Perelman, Ch. Das Reich der Rhetorik; Rhetorik und Argumentation, 1980

[8] Cfr. Feijó, Carlos, A coexistência normativa entre o Estado e as Autoridades Tradicionais na Ordem

Angolan Plural Law, Coimbra, Almedina, 2012.

[9] Fernandes, T. 2009. Local power in Mozambique. Decentralization, legal pluralism and legitimacy. Porto, Edições Afrontamento, p. 40

The current economic situation in China and Angola

China’s economic crisis: facts and causes

There is a problem in the Chinese economy that appears to be structural and could affect relations with debtor countries such as Angola. Various factors are contributing to a decline in economic growth in China and an increase in unemployment, especially among young people, which could also imply some political instability within China itself.

Let’s start with some recent figures[1] :

-The July credit data released on 11 August showed a drop in demand for loans from companies.

-Retail sales rose by just 2.5 per cent in July compared to the previous year, below expectations of a 4.5 per cent increase.

-Industrial production only rose by 3.7 per cent in July compared to the previous year, below the 4.4 per cent increase that analysts were expecting.

The truth is that recent statistics published by China have caused severe concern.  In addition to the aforementioned statistics, consumer prices in July were lower than a year ago, suggesting that we may be on the verge of deflation, which reflects a chronic shortage of demand in the economy. China’s foreign trade in the same month of July showed a sharp drop in exports due to weak global demand, accompanied by a sharper decline in imports, signifying the aforementioned weakness in domestic demand. Chinese companies and families are “shrinking”[2] . The seriousness of the situation led China’s leaders at a Politburo meeting last month to refer to this year’s economic recovery as “torture[3] .”

This poor performance raises several thoughts. The first is that we shouldn’t exaggerate. Just as there was an exaggeration in previous announcements about China as an economic superpower, when its GDP per capita will not exceed 13,000 USD in 2021,[4] while the GDP per capita in the United States is more than 70,000 USD, or even 25,000 USD in Portugal, the opposite exaggeration should not be made either, that China has entered an insurmountable abyss. What is clear is that the Chinese economy is in a moment of correction, as is the case with all economies, possibly requiring profound reforms and political adjustments.

Therefore, the context we have adopted in this work is to consider a crisis in the Chinese economy, but to believe that the right policy choices can overcome this crisis.

At this very moment, hopes of a Chinese recovery from the pandemic have faded, as consumption has generally been very subdued, especially for expensive items such as cars and houses, and private investment, the backbone of China’s economy, fell in the first half of this year for the first time since such data was published. Private companies and entrepreneurs aren’t spending much on investment or hiring staff. Youth unemployment has reached 21 per cent. The annual graduation of 11 to 12 million students this summer will exacerbate an already difficult situation because of the problems of finding suitable work and also because the Chinese labour market has become one in which most jobs are low-paid, low-skilled or in the informal economy.

It seems wrong to attribute all this to the pandemic. Most of the threats to China’s economy were growing a few years ago. The fundamental problem is that China has generated, over the last decade or more, a mountain of bad debts, unprofitable and uncommercial infrastructure and real estate, empty flat blocks, underused transport facilities and overcapacity, for example in coal, steel, solar panels and electric vehicles. Productivity growth has stagnated and China can boast one of the highest levels of inequality in the world[5] .

Furthermore, under Xi Jinping, it developed a more intense, state-centred and controlling system of governance, both for political reasons and to deal with the effects of its ailing development model.

We wonder to what extent the political interventions to limit billionaires like Jack Ma[6] have been positive for the economic environment. Whilst it’s true that they have averted the Russian danger of oligarchic state domination and signalled to the general population that power is concerned about excesses, it’s also true that they have sent a chill down the entrepreneurial spirit necessary for a competitive economy. Everyone will be afraid of growing too much, of being too conspicuous and, ultimately, of innovating. Because innovation and excessive attention can have negative repercussions.

In a way, the “animal spirit” that Keynes spoke of as the engine of any healthy economy has been “tamed” in China and this may be the main problem of its economy, which is neither measurable nor solvable with technical measures.

Chinese reaction and other possible directions

For the time being, China has announced the suspension of the release of the official unemployment rate among China’s urban youth aged between 16 and 24, which reached a new all-time high of 21.3 per cent in June. The State Council published new guidelines for stepping up efforts to attract foreign investment. And the central bank lowered interest rates[7] .
 None of these measures seem to have the strength to reverse the cycle of decline in the Chinese economy.

Many authors argue that a huge fiscal stimulus would be needed to energise the economy, which should not be translated into more debt, but into pure “printing” of money, which makes sense in a situation of deflation. A kind of “helicopters with money” flying over the cities and dropping it off.[8]

It is also possible that this crisis will force the Chinese president to revise his policy towards the large economic groups and the business community in general, opting, like Lenin a century ago, for a new liberalisation and flexibilisation, while also seeking to ease the tension that has been building up between China and the United States.

In fact, we believe that a good part of the solution to China’s current economic problems lies in politics rather than economics, and in both domestic and foreign policy. Probably the best way out of the crisis would be to reintroduce the more ambiguous and flexible system of Jiang Zemin’s time. Jiang Zemin, president of China from 1993 to 2003, is considered “the man who changed China”. Many Chinese who grew up in the 1990s remember Jiang Zemin for overseeing China’s entry into the World Trade Organisation, and also for allowing the film Titanic to be broadcast. During the Asian financial crisis, Jiang emphasised the importance of finance and financial security for China’s national security and the building of a modern economy. At the same time, this did not imply a lessening of the power of the Chinese Communist Party and its political control. Some authors point to his tarnished record in relation to human rights and freedom of expression. Zemin oversaw the repression of national dissidents, the banning of religious groups such as Falun Gong and the suppression of the press and the Internet, and also maintained an uncompromising stance on Taiwan[9] .

The advantage for Jiang Zemin’s China is that he was able to maintain a balance between liberating market forces and innovation, and the Communist Party’s control of China.

And our opinion is that a large part of the Chinese crisis is not the result of economic factors alone or above all, but of the loss of that balance point that needs to be recovered.

Obviously, this doesn’t just depend on the Chinese leadership, but also on a change in the external situation of quasi-confrontation between the United States and China.

It’s well known that since the time of Donald Trump there has been a shift in US foreign policy towards China. What seemed like “Trumpism” became a central US policy under Joe Biden and today the United States sees and treats China as a potential future enemy that must be contained. Naturally, this coincided with Xi Jinping’s nationalist assertion, which abandoned the previous external caution, and began to want a strong China in the world context and without complexes, wanting the country to be a post-hegemonic alternative to the United States. So on both sides we had a voluntary confrontational initiative.

The question that arises is whether it is possible to retract and create a new space for US-China collaboration, which will certainly increase China’s prosperity, or whether the course is definitely strategic confrontation? In this confrontation, China will tend to compartmentalise and close itself off, losing the capacity for innovation linked to entrepreneurship, which increases the chances of conflict (more or less direct war) and hinders any Chinese economic recovery.

Impacts in Angola

This is the real situation of the Chinese economy at the moment. As mentioned, the fundamental “brakes” on growth seem to be twofold: from an economic point of view, excessive debt, and from a political point of view, which seems more important to us for the medium and long term, the accentuation of the force of political power in the economy and society, and the political condemnation of entrepreneurship and innovation.

Faced with this scenario, Angola is confronted with advantages and disadvantages that act dynamically.

One advantage is Luanda’s rapprochement with the United States and its relations with China. Angola could be a bridge country for a reunion between the two powers, a kind of proving ground where both can co-operate, compete and survive for mutual benefit. However, it could also become a disadvantage for the same reason, with Angola becoming one of the areas of dispute between the two powers, both wanting to pull it into their sphere of influence. This would be another difficult balance for João Lourenço to maintain.

In economic terms, there will be a possible tendency for the Chinese authorities to become more inflexible in relation to foreign debts, and this may already be happening with Angola, or could happen in the future. This is the normal reaction of countries in a “squeeze.” There is therefore the danger of greater Chinese pressure in economic terms on Angola, which could jeopardise Angola’s once again perilous public finances.

The “tree of patacas” spirit that prevailed in China-Angola financial relations from 2002 onwards is definitely over and will not be recovered. China will behave towards Angola, in greater or lesser detail, like any other international creditor, and its pressure will increase as the Chinese domestic economic situation deteriorates. Another challenge for João Lourenço.

One advantage that Angola could offer China is the creation of a large labour market for its young graduates. Cooperation agreements could be made to put Chinese people in Angola to train Angolan staff and help implement policies in areas such as public administration, in which China has millennia of experience, or telecommunications and information technology.

The Chinese civil service system has provided stability for the Chinese empire for more than 2,000 years and has provided one of the main outlets for social mobility in Chinese society. Today, in the 1980s, it has made a successful transition from a centralised Marxist economy to a mixed economy with strong growth.

China has also become one of the largest telecoms markets in the world, with more than one billion Internet users and monthly revenues of more than 130 billion yuan from the telecoms sector. The country has undergone several waves of reforms over the last three decades to liberalise and privatise its telecommunications industry. It is the experience gained in this immensity that can be put at the service of Angolans.

In these terms, the current phase of China-Angola relations could partly leave physical capital behind and centre on human capital, showing that relations between countries can mature. Angola could provide an outlet for Chinese companies and their young people.

What we have to realise is that the relationship is entering a “mature” phase in which each country has its own interests to defend.  China will no longer bring “rains of money”, but rational investments, and this is what Angola must count on and counter. In fact, in terms of future markets, investment opportunities and an escape from China’s problems, Angola has a lot to offer and can be the “bargaining chip” in various negotiations.





[5] On the structural and long-term problems of the Chinese economy see Frank Dikotter, China after Mao – The rise of a superpower, 2023.



[8] Rui Verde, Helicópteros com dinheiro, 2013


The “Russian belt” in the Sahel and Angola

The coup in Niger

Mr Mohamed Bazoum was the freely elected president of Niger in 2021. He was deposed in July 2023 by the Presidential Guard, joined by the army. At the time of writing, General Abdourahmane Tchiani, who had led the presidential guard since 2011, announced that he was the top leader of the military junta that took power in that African country[1] .

The formal pattern of seizure of power by a “National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland” (NCSH), seems to follow the coup of Assimi Goïta in Mali in 2020. In fact, the methods are the same: suspension of the constitutional order, establishment of a curfew, closure of borders. A state of exception that recent experiences among Sahelian neighbours affected by this military epidemic show can last for months or even years.

Most interestingly, however, the first Russian flags began to appear in the hands of some of the pro-junta demonstrators on the streets of the Nigerian capital,[2] as has happened in other coups in Francophone African countries.

Indeed, the fall of Bazoum may possibly represent the fall of one of the last French bastions in the Sahel, and most likely, another step by Russia in the creation of a “red” belt in this African region, although at this point there are still disagreements about the existence or extent of Russian intervention in the coup[3] . Even if Russia did not have a direct role in the coup, it may, in line with what has been its recent opportunistic policy in Africa, seize the moment.

Let’s look at recent military coups, African geography, and how Russia establishes its belt.

The formation of the “Russian belt”

Starting on the Atlantic coast, in 2021, we have the coup d’état in Guinea Conakry carried out by a military man, Colonel Mamady Doumbouya, who for the moment has established an authoritarian regime, albeit with the promise of elections in 2025. Although, there was no Russian appearance at the genesis of the coup, as Russia had a good relationship with Alpha Condé, the deposed president, apparently, after the coup relations between Guinea and Russia have been intensifying with several Russian visits to the presidential palace in 2022. In any case, Mamady Doumbouya seems, for the moment, to be the typical populist nationalist military man who is still looking for a way forward, and the truth is that one cannot yet speak of manifest Russian influence in Guinea-Conakry.

Unlike in Mali and Burkina Faso, it is not the head of the ruling military junta in Conakry who will go to St Petersburg. Colonel Mamadi Doumbouya was represented by Dr Dansa Kourouma (President of the National Transitional Council) and Dr Morissanda Kouyaté (Minister of Foreign Affairs). Thus, in Guinea Conakry a clear pro-Russian regime does not yet seem to be established, but it is unique in the recent coup movements in the Sahel/Central African zone.

Bordering Guinea-Conakry is Mali, here the situation is quite clear and marks the effective beginning of what we will call the “Russian belt”. In Mali there was a coup d’état in 2021, in which Colonel Assimi Goïta took power. Russian military personnel have been in Mali since mid-2022, and the presence of the Wagner group is also confirmed. Mali and Russia have signed a cooperation agreement on security, intelligence, risk and disaster management, counter-narcotics and personnel training. The Russian presence is undeniable, as is France’s loss of influence in the country, which has withdrawn militarily, with some of its forces going to Niger (where they may now be leaving). Mali’s president was at the Russia Africa Forum.

Next to Mali is Burkina Faso. Here, the military coup took place in 2022, in fact there were two coups that year. In the final coup, the officer Ibrahim Traoré took power. The result of the takeover was the expulsion of the French military contingent in the country and rapprochement with Russia. Traoré also went to St Petersburg.

If you look at Niger, if the coup and the rapprochement with Russia materialize, it adds a large territory to the Russian belt. Chad is actually missing, as Sudan and Eritrea are next.

Eritrea is a fearsome dictatorship, where there have never been elections. Along with Belarus, Syria and North Korea, Eritrea was one of four countries, not including Russia, to vote against a UN General Assembly resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

As for Sudan, the presence of the Wagner group has been recorded since 2017. Sudan is among the few countries that officially recognized the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and voted against UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (which condemned the Russian annexation of the Ukrainian territory), which demonstrated the close relations between Russia and Sudan. In July 2022, Russia obtained gold from Wagner facilities near Abidiya in Sudan to support the war in Ukraine. Russia is the main arms supplier to Sudan.

In February 2023, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met with Sudanese officials in Khartoum, including Sudanese Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, Rapid Support Forces leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, and Acting Foreign Minister Ali Al-Sadiq Ali to strengthen relations and to finalize the review of an agreement to build a naval base in Port Sudan, which awaits ratification by Sudan’s yet-to-be-formed legislative body. As we know, the situation in Sudan is very turbulent, but there is a lot of Russian influence.

The “Russian belt”

Therefore, we have an almost continuous line from east to west Africa where a “Russian belt” is forming.

In practice, Chad remains, where French influence is strong, but instability and the existence of guerrilla groups are noticeable. And it is enough to mention that Chad could be totally surrounded, as to the north in Libya there is a strong presence of the Wagner group, as on the southern border in the Central African Republic, taking into account that to the west there is Niger and to the east Sudan, one can anticipate that Chad is surrounded and could soon complete the “Russian belt”.

Roughly speaking, the “Russian belt” can be said to correspond to the Sahel region. There are some exceptions, such as Mauritania and Senegal, and some additions such as the Central African Republic. But what is certain is that a line is being drawn in the sand that divides Africa, precisely in the area where sub-Saharan Africa meets North Africa.

Possibly, the Russian intervention did not follow a pre-established plan, but opportunistically took advantage of various events in the area, in which the French ineptitude in developing the countries and securing the support of the population of the region, and the Islamic incursions stand out.

It is also true that Russian control is not homogeneous in all countries and the situation is perilous. There is no hard data, other than the peoples’ search for ways out of the neo-colonial recipes offered by France and the West’s general inattention to the suffering of this area of the globe, despite politically correct discourses.

The space occupied by Russia is not so much the result of the call for any solution from Moscow, but the displeasure at the lack of solutions from the West.

But that a “Russian order” is being established is a fact. Recent proof of this is Vladimir Putin’s offer of grain to six African countries. Among them are members of this “belt”, four to be precise: Burkina Faso, Mali, Central African Republic and Eritrea. The remaining two are Zimbabwe and Somalia[4] . It is clear to see the weight that the “Russian belt” already has in defining Russian policy.

Fig. 1- Sahel in Africa where the “Russian belt” passes. Photo published by the BBC at

Fig. 2- Ongoing “Russian belt”. Libya is not part of the belt, but it is an area where Russia participates with the Wagner group in the civil war

The global effects of the ‘Russian belt’

Having established the construction of the “Russian belt” in the African Sahel, it is worth noting the main consequences both globally and for Angola.

The first global consequence is Russia’s political reassertion. The country is demonstrating that it knows how to globalize a dispute, not by situating it only in Ukraine, but by globalizing it, bringing together a set of supports that may seem weak individually, but together achieve extreme strategic relevance, already calling into question French influence in the region. For the moment, the big loser is France, but Russia can project other losses or gains, depending on the perspective, both strategic and economic.

In strategic terms, it is well known that the Sahel region has a strong and direct strategic importance for Europe in two areas, in the fight against terrorism and migration. In fact, António Costa, Prime Minister of Portugal when the country held the presidency of the European Union, emphasized that “The Sahel is a strategic region for the European Union, taking into account the security challenges and its role in the broader regional context, including Libya, the Gulf of Guinea and the Central African Republic” and added that the security of the Sahel “is undeniably linked to the security of Europe; that is why we must work together, as equals, with a very clear objective: to achieve lasting peace and build shared prosperity together”.[5]

From now on, Russia has a pressure valve on the EU in terms of terrorism and migration, and can in practice increase or decrease migration flows from Africa to European shores.

As for Islamist terrorism, Russia has been its enemy, but recent events have made it a de facto ally of Iran and sometimes the “enemy of our enemy is our friend”. It should not be forgotten that the Islamist insurgency in Afghanistan in the 1980s was initially funded by the United States as a way of weakening the Soviet Union. Nothing prevents the reverse from happening.

Moreover, this “belt” allows for easier projection of force, whether political or military, whether in formal terms or in what is called “asymmetric warfare”. Below is the Democratic Republic of Congo, a source of immense wealth that arouses global greed. Above and beside Libya is Egypt and its Suez Canal. These are two “prizes” that will get closer the moment Russia draws a straight line of dominance coast to coast in Africa.

From an economic point of view, although they are countries in extreme poverty, often, in terms of mineral and natural resources they have something to note. In very brief terms, Mali has gold, Burkina Faso has various non-ferrous and industrial metals, Niger oil and uranium, the Central African Republic gold, and so on. There is a wealth of resources to exploit.

Angola and the “Russian belt”

Finally, it is worth reflecting on Angola’s role vis-à-vis a “Russian belt”. Angola was traditionally a Russian ally, one of the main ones in Africa. It no longer is.

The current President is trying to position the country as a regional power close to the West and with good relations with China and Russia, but trying to solve African problems in Africa. It is clear that the creation of the “Russian belt” poses major obstacles to this desire for Angola. With a strong Russia mediating between North and South Africa, Angola’s role as a regional power is emptied, and everything returns to the clashes of the Cold War, now renewed.

Thus, the “Russian belt” clashes directly with Angola’s regional prospective interests and its desire for peace and stability on the continent.

And there is a second aspect, which is João Lourenço’s promotion of constitutional normality. The Angolan President has condemned all non-constitutional changes in Africa. The fact is that the changes promoted by Russia are non-constitutional, based on coups d’état promoted by the military.

And directly, Angola’s national stability and security would be jeopardised if there were any kind of intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo that would agitate the country even more than it already is.

To this extent, Angola is not currently likely to take a favourable view of the extension of the “Russian belt” in the Sahel, despite the cordial relations that exist between the two countries.






The economic situation in Angola and Agenda 2050

Recent economic turmoil

The results of Angola’s economic policy, which had been favourably received by international institutions and public opinion in recent times, namely low inflation, fiscal consolidation, control of public debt and the success of foreign exchange liberalisation, seemed to suffer a blow in June.

The trigger for this change in perception was the abrupt announcement of the rise of more than 80% in the price of commercial petrol, due to the partial withdrawal of the state subsidy (without the necessary focus on the mitigation measures that had been well thought out), which was followed by a series of cascading events, the resignation of Manuel Nunes Júnior as Minister of State for Economic Coordination, some rumours about delayed public service salaries, and inevitably the announcement by a rating agency that Angola’s economic outlook had been downgraded from “positive” to “stable”.[1]In addition, the Kwanza is depreciating rapidly against the dollar and the euro. At the end of June, the Angolan national currency passed 800 kwanzas to the dollar for the first time.[2]

The depreciation of the kwanza has raised renewed fears of inflation, in a country still heavily dependent on imports for its daily life. Last February, the National Bank of Angola said that the country would spend over US$2 billion (1.8 billion euros) on food imports in 2022, representing a 40 percent increase over the previous year.[3] A lower value of the national currency and a rise in food import requirements obviously results in higher prices.

In turn, the statement that the new Minister of State and Economic Coordination made about the delays in some public salaries in May, did not reassure, since Lima Massano assured that this was due to “a time lag between the time of receipt of the funds resulting from tax collection and the period of payments.”[4] The minister’s explanation is not contested, the problem is that even if we accept it, it contains a problem, which is that of the government’s lack of cash reserves, indicating that the budgetary restraint imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has not created any space for Angolan public finances. It should be noted that although the price of oil is not very high, over the last six months it has fluctuated between USD 70 and 80, with prevalence at USD 75/76. As the State Budget was based on 75 USD (which we criticised at the time[5] ), the truth is that the price has been in line with the forecast, although with no margin for manoeuvre.

The possible effect of oil prices

In the light of the above, in theory, the price of oil will not yet have a negative effect on the State Budget in the immediate future.

However, this could happen in the second half of the year. We have formed the opinion that there is a strong downward pressure on the price resulting from the oil embargoes on Russia and probably Iran. Our thesis is that these Western oil embargoes do not have the effect of significantly restricting the supply of that product by Russia, which would push up the price of oil, but rather of selling it at a discount to intermediaries who act as “laundromats”. This means that the longer the oil embargo on Russia lasts, the more Russia will make the circumvention mechanisms efficient and the more it will sell oil at a discount. Thus, it is very possible that there will continue to be downward pressure on the price of oil, especially if China’s economy continues not to show the strength of the past.

Consequently, it may be that fiscal tightening will intensify in the second half of this year if oil prices succumb to these pressures.

The doctrinal and practical problem

The concrete fact is that IMF “recipes” in Angola seem to have failed, and once again the application of classical economic doctrines does not work.

It is increasingly clear that a universal theory of economics based on the classical thinking disseminated by North American universities may work in mature developed economies or in places with relatively solid institutions (market, government, courts), but it does not work in countries still suffering from extreme imbalances and under institutional construction. It cannot speak of true markets functioning freely according to the rules of supply and demand, nor of efficient governance or even of a justice system approaching that which works in Angola. For various reasons, these are unfinished processes in the making. To that extent, any economic model that takes them as preconditions will fail. That is why the IMF measures fail, failing to bring prosperity to Angola and making the country go from one crisis to another. It should be stressed that since 2009 the IMF has been monitoring and agreeing with Angola’s economic policies.

There is a doctrinal problem underlying the negative impact of economic policy in Angola that is linked to the fact that the main decision-makers are trained in foreign universities that adopt institutional models of the market economy, with greater or lesser state intervention, but always assuming that the situation is operating normally. The truth is that Angola is in a pre-institutional situation, so the models to be applied should be those of development and institutional building rather than stabilization. This problem, while seemingly very theoretical, has real practical relevance, since something is being applied that has little to do with reality.

Furthermore, some fundamental structural reforms were not undertaken by the government. A system marked by the interference of politicians in the running of companies was maintained, with continued investment in oligopolies that are essentially importers, justice was not speeded up and bureaucracy was clearly not reduced.

The combination of these factors means that the Angolan economy has not yet emerged from the oil cycle and from repeating past mistakes.

The questioning of Agenda 2050

It is these basic deficiencies that appear to limit the effect of Agenda 2050. In a previous report we praised the unassuming and honest way in which the authors of the Agenda made the diagnosis of the past and present situation[6] , and we had some anticipation in reading the proposals for the future.

It is evident that Agenda 2050[7] has many interesting objectives and profound analyses that stimulate the debate, which should be broadened in Angolan society. However, at its core the document does not bring us the necessary ambition and has the defect of being based, as we have mentioned, on generalist models.

If we notice the essential core of the strategic objectives is hardly mobilising. The predicted increase until 2050 of the GDP is 2.4 times, which in terms of GDP per capita, assuming that the population growth is only 2.1 times (and may be much more) results in an increase from USD 3,675 to USD 4,215 of the mentioned GDP per capita. If we look at this, it is a rise in population welfare of only 14% in 27 years[8] . Add that unemployment will still be around 20%. An extremely high figure, although the statistical formula used by the National Statistics Institute of Angola (INEA) cannot be compared with others because it is more demanding and therefore presents more negative results .[9]

It is very discouraging. In fact, in view of the increase in population, what Agenda 2050 is putting as a goal is a quasi-progression. Is it not possible to do differently?

Angola in 2050 is supposed to be similar to what today are countries like Paraguay, Jordan, Sri Lanka, Essuatini or Mongolia[10] . We cannot subscribe to this vision, which in practice envisages a stagnant country where a sharper rise in population will pose severe problems.


In all independence and objectivity, we believe that this future Agenda should be fundamentally revised and substantially altered with the participation of the Economic and Social Council, the various study centres working on Angola in universities and elsewhere, and the country’s living forces, with a view to presenting a model that is both ambitious and feasible for Angola’s future. Only in this way will the current problems resulting from bad doctrinal models and little structural reformism be overcome.

Further and faster has to be the motto of the future.








[8] Idem, note 7, p. 22.


[10] Countries that currently have a GDP per capita close to 4125 USD. GDP, Per Capita GDP – US Dollars”, and 2018 to generate the table), United Nations Statistical Division.